Skip to content
On Demand Webinar

Product Changes and Variants: Testing and Approval Consequences Webinar

Product development rarely ends at initial certification. Whether driven by supply chain constraints, component End-of-Life (EOL), cost optimizations, or feature expansions, manufacturers frequently modify wireless and connected devices throughout their lifecycle. However, even seemingly minor design tweaks or introducing a product variant can invalidate existing compliance approvals and trigger unexpected testing obligations.   

In this webinar, Michael Derby, Technical Director at Element Connected Technologies, breaks down the regulatory implications of product changes and variants. This guide outlines key global requirements, risk assessment protocols, and strategies to maintain compliance under FCC, ISED, and EU Radio Equipment Directive (RED) frameworks.  

 

Why watch this Product Changes and Variants webinar?  

This is a practical session for teams who already hold an approval and now need to defend it across several models. After watching, you will be able to: 

  • Scope exactly how much testing a family of models needs. 
  • Stop guessing the worst-case model, because the most populated one often is not it. 
  • See why the test results, not your judgment, decide the permissive change class. 
  • Know where the lab's job ends and where deriving compliance becomes yours. 
  • Avoid building a RED partial-testing case that a target market later rejects. 

 

Key topics covered in this webinar  

  • Why are testing and authorization not the same thing?  
  • When does a change need a new certification rather than a permissive change?  
  • What makes a change Class I rather than Class II, and can you predict it?  
  • Which apparently minor design changes actually affect EMC results?  
  • When can several models sit under one certification?  
  • How do you identify and prove the worst-case model?  
  • How does the RED handle changes without a permissive change process?  
  • Will an EU test report support approvals in other markets?  

 

Watch the webinar below 

Webinar Timeline

 

0:00 – Introduction and the core problem 

Michael sets up the session: test a product, approve it, then later change it or sell variants and a family of models. He explains why "similar products" does not remove the need to test each one, using the USA, Canada, the EU and UK as examples.
 

4:08 – Testing versus approvals 

Why the two are linked but not the same. A passed test is not an approval, and the right labels do not mean a product is validly approved if the correct testing was never done. 
 

5:06 – North America: SDoC and certification 

The assessment scope for FCC certification and ISED certification for Canada, covering RF exposure, EMC emissions and radio performance, and the two routes. SDoC for digital devices and receivers, certification for transmitters. Both require testing. 
 

11:17 – Certification bodies and why testing is mandatory 

The role of a TCB, CB or FCB, and three reasons you must test correctly: authorization depends on it, surveillance testing must match your results, and changes force a retest and comparison. 
 

14:15 – Changes and permissive changes in North America 

A transmitter change needs a new certification and new testing. A non-transmitter change on a certified product is a permissive change. Class 1 means results stayed the same or better; Class 2 means they got worse. The result decides the class, not a guess, because small hardware changes can move EMC emissions in ways you cannot predict, and depopulation still counts as a change. 
 

31:07 – Multiple models and the family approach 

When several models share a transmitter under one certification, you can test the transmitter's radio frequency (RF) performance once but must run emissions on every model. You cannot prove a worst case without testing them all, and the lab reports only what it tested. 
 

42:01 – Europe: the Radio Equipment Directive 

The RED Directive Testing needs an assessment, not mandatory testing, ending in a manufacturer's declaration of conformity with no certification or permissive change. Full testing to harmonized standards is the common route because it gives presumption of conformity. Changes are handled through the manufacturer's risk assessment, and notified bodies give a technical judgment, not just a homework check. 
 

53:31 – Common mistakes and global market access 

Frequent errors across both regions, including untracked changes, out-of-date declarations, avoiding testing on small changes, and guessing the worst case. Labs everywhere test only what they are told, so confirm with your global market access provider whether a target market needs a full accredited report per model. 
"You don't always have to re-test everything, but you always have to justify why you didn't. The key is having a documented technical evaluation that stands up to regulatory audit"
Michael DerbyTechnical Director

Related Services

product certification and approvals

Electronic Product Certification and Approvals Services

Accelerate your electronic product certification with Element's ISO 17065-accredited services. Access 167 markets through one trusted partner. Expert testing & compliance support.

Wireless Network

Wireless Device Testing & Certification

Get your wireless devices to market faster with Element's accredited testing services. Expert guidance through compliance, certification and global approvals for all wireless technologies.

Global Market Access (GMA) Services

Global Market Access (GMA) Services

Accelerate international product certification with Element's Global Market Access Services. Navigate complex regulations, reduce testing time & get to market faster.

Speak to our team of experts

AMERICAS

Toll free from US lines

+1 888 786 7555

EUROPE

Contact our Central Team
UK

Freephone from UK

+44 808 234 1667

Germany

Freephone from Germany 

+49 800 000 5137

MIDDLE EAST

Toll free from UAE

+971 800 353 6368