How to Choose an NDSRI Testing Laboratory: Vendor Qualification Questions
Effective NDSRI testing programs depend on lab partners who understand product-specific method development, parts-per-billion detection, and regulatory submission requirements. This checklist, developed from our team's experience supporting NDSRI programs across multiple drug classes and dosage forms, identifies the technical questions that separate genuine NDSRI expertise from general analytical capability.
Why Laboratory Selection Matters for NDSRI Programs
FDA's September 2024 revised guidance draws a clear distinction between nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities and small molecule nitrosamines like NDMA or NDEA, a distinction with significant implications for manufacturers building analytical control strategies. Because NDSRIs share structural similarity with the API itself, detecting them at parts-per-billion levels within complex matrices requires specialized instrumentation and proven experience managing the matrix effects that arise from high API and excipient concentrations. Standardized methods rarely translate directly; effective NDSRI testing typically requires product-specific method development.
Manufacturers working toward compliance with the timelines FDA established in that guidance also need lab partners who can deliver technically sound, submission-ready data without extending program schedules.
Vendor Evaluation Questions
Use this checklist during your lab evaluation process to help assess whether a provider's expertise matches the technical and regulatory demands of your program.
Experience & Expertise
- Do you have experience developing NDSRI methods for APIs in our drug class?
- How many NDSRI method development projects have you completed?
- Can you provide examples of similar products you've tested?
What to listen for: Experienced labs will speak specifically about the API classes and dosage forms they've worked with. Answers that reference how structural similarity to the API influenced method development decisions for specific product types tend to indicate more relevant experience.
Technical Capabilities
- What instrumentation do you use for NDSRI testing?
- How do you handle matrix effects from high API concentrations?
- What's your approach to forced degradation studies under nitrosating conditions?
- What are your typical detection limits for NDSRI testing?
What to listen for: On matrix effects, labs that can describe their approach in concrete terms, rather than speaking in generalities, tend to have more relevant hands-on experience. For forced degradation, answers that reference nitrosating conditions relevant to specific product types tend to indicate more product-specific experience. Detection limits relative to the thresholds your control strategy requires are a practical point of comparison.
Process & Timeline
- What's your typical timeline for product-specific NDSRI method development and validation?
- How do you approach method validation for product-specific NDSRIs?
- Do you have capacity to meet our project timeline?
What to listen for: NDSRI method development requires optimization across extraction, chromatography, and mass spectrometry parameters. Timelines that don't reflect this complexity, along with current workload and project capacity, are practical factors to consider during evaluation.
Regulatory & Quality
- Are you FDA-registered and inspected?
- Can you provide documentation suitable for regulatory submissions?
- What quality control measures do you implement for NDSRI testing?
What to listen for: FDA registration is a baseline expectation rather than a differentiator on its own. Documentation formats and levels of detail can vary between labs, so understanding what their submission packages typically include and how they're structured gives you a clearer picture of fit with your regulatory team's needs.
Risk Assessment Support
- Can you support NDSRI risk assessment, or only testing?
- Do you have experience with risk assessments for our type of product?
What to listen for: Risk assessment and analytical testing are distinct activities, and not all labs offer both. Risk assessment requires familiarity with NDSRI formation pathways, which is a different capability set than end-product confirmatory testing.
Communication & Partnership
- Who will be our primary technical contact?
- How do you handle unexpected results or method challenges?
- Can you provide interim updates during method development?
What to listen for: Product-specific method development rarely proceeds without some troubleshooting, so how a lab answers the question about unexpected results can be a useful indicator of how they approach problem-solving in practice. Labs with substantial NDSRI experience can often describe specific challenges they have encountered and how they resolved them. Accessibility of the scientists doing the work is a practical consideration throughout method development.
Download a PDF version of this vendor qualification checklist to print or share with your sourcing team.
Making Your Lab Selection Decision
The complexity of NDSRI testing, from product-specific method development through parts-per-billion detection in matrices dominated by high API concentrations, requires lab partners with specialized analytical capabilities and relevant experience navigating these technical challenges. Labs that can articulate their specific approach to matrix effect management and forced degradation study design are generally better positioned to demonstrate relevant hands-on experience.
These considerations make lab partner selection a decision worth approaching with the same rigor as the testing program itself.
What the evaluation process ultimately comes down to is whether a lab has developed the product-specific expertise and submission-ready infrastructure that complex NDSRI programs actually require. Regulatory frameworks set the standard; the lab you select determines the quality of the data supporting your submission.
Element's NDSRI Testing Capabilities
Element provides comprehensive NDSRI testing through our FDA-registered and inspected laboratories. Our capabilities include product-specific method development with advanced LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS instrumentation, experience across diverse API classes and complex matrices, forced degradation study design and execution, method validation for regulatory submissions, and risk assessments.
Contact our pharmaceutical testing team to discuss your specific NDSRI testing requirements.
Related Services

Extractables and Leachables Testing Services
Element provides tailored extractables and leachables testing (E&L) studies to ensure patient safety and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Stability and Forced Degradation Testing of Pharmaceuticals and Biologics
ICH-compliant pharmaceutical and biologics stability and forced degradation testing with advanced analytics, specialized storage, and regulatory support—designed to reduce risk and support successful drug development and submissions.

Analytical Method Development & Validation
Element's regulatory and industry experts have a proven track record of successfully developing and validating fit-for-purpose, accurate, and reliable analytical methods based on established CDER/ICH and FDA guidelines and procedures.

Pharmaceutical Unknown Identification and Impurity Testing
Element offers expert impurity testing services for pharmaceuticals, ensuring drug safety, quality, and compliance with FDA and ICH guidelines through advanced analytical methods and tailored solutions.

Pharmaceutical Testing Services
Element leads the way in pharmaceutical testing services, delivering trusted expertise from prototype to analysis and finished product. With 150+ global pharmaceutical experts and 30+ years of experience.




